Fossil Hand From “Ardi” Could Clarify Our Evolution
A 4.4 million-year-old skeleton could show how early humans moved and began to walk upright, according to new research led by a Texas A&M anthropology professor.
By Kieth Randall, Texas A&M University Division of Marketing & Communication
Evolutionary expert Charles Darwin and others recognized a close evolutionary relationship among humans, chimps, and gorillas based on their shared anatomies, raising some big questions: how are humans related to other primates, and exactly how did early humans move around? The new findings may hold some answers.
Thomas Cody Prang, assistant professor of anthropology at Texas A&M University, and colleagues examined the skeletal remains of Ardipithecus ramidus (“Ardi”), and found in Ethiopia. One of Ardi’s hands was exceptionally well-preserved.
The researchers compared the shape of Ardi’s hand to hundreds of other hand specimens representing recent humans, apes, and monkeys (measured from bones in museum collections around the world) to make comparisons about the kind of locomotor behavior used by the earliest hominins (fossil human relatives).
“Bone shape reflects adaptation to particular habits or lifestyles—for example the movement of primates—and by drawing connections between bone shape and behavior among living forms, we can make inferences about the behavior of extinct species, such as Ardi, that we can’t directly observe, Prang says.
“Additionally, we found evidence for a big evolutionary ‘jump’ between the kind of hand represented by Ardi and all later hominin hands, including that of Lucy’s species (a famous 3.2 million-year-old well-preserved skeleton found in the same area in the 1970s). This ‘evolutionary jump’ happens at a critical time when hominins are evolving adaptations to a more human-like form of upright walking, and the earliest evidence for hominin stone-tool manufacture and stone-tool use, such as cut-marks on animal fossils, are discovered.”
The fact that Ardi represents an earlier phase of human evolutionary history is important, says Prang, because it potentially shines light on the kind of ancestor from which humans and chimpanzees evolved.
“Our study supports a classic idea first proposed by Charles Darwin in 1871, when he had no fossils or understanding of genetics, that the use of the hands and upper limbs for manipulation appeared in early human relatives in connection with upright walking,” he says. “The evolution of human hands and feet probably happened in a correlated fashion.”
Since Ardi is such an ancient species, it might retain skeletal features that were present in the last common ancestor of humans and chimpanzees. If this is true, it could help researchers place the origin of the human lineage—in addition to upright walking—into a clearer light.
“It potentially brings us one step closer to an explanation for how and why humans evolved our form of upright walking,” Prang says.
He adds that the big change in hand anatomy between Ardi and all later hominins occurs at a time, roughly between 4.4 and 3.3 million years ago, coinciding with the earliest evidence of the loss of a grasping big toe in human evolution. This also coincides with the earliest known stone tools and stone cut-marked animal fossils.
He says it appears to mark a major change in the lifestyle and behavior of human relatives within this timeframe.
“We propose that it involves the evolution of more advanced upright walking, which enabled human hands to be modified by the evolutionary process for enhanced manual manipulation, possibly involving stone tools,” Prang says.
The Wenner Gren Foundation supported the work.
Originally published here by Texas A&M Today.